| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TFBW Deus Ex Machina

Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1233 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:31 pm Post subject: What do you do with a troll? |
|
|
Every universe has its unpleasant characters: Douglas Adams had the delightfully dislikable Vogons; Tolkien had Orcs and Trolls, and so on. On a forum like this, you will get many different participants (or flame warriors), some of which are analogous to Adams' Vogons or Tolkien's Trolls. The appearance of conflicting or anti-social elements is inevitable: the question is how ought we deal with it when it happens?
Two obvious approaches are "delete offending posts" and "do nothing at all". I'm not particularly fond of either of these approaches. Doing nothing at all tends to lower the forum to a fairly predictable level, colloquially known as the lowest common demonimator. The Trolls drive out the Elves, so to speak.
Deleting offending posts is probably better, but not much. A determined Troll will take deletion as a challenge -- even a victory. A Troll might also play a game of brinkmanship; aiming for the borderline where some will complain if the post is not deleted, and others will cry "unfair censorship" if it is.
In a practical sense, we're constrained by the forum software: there's only so many actions a moderator can take. I'm somewhat inclined to set up a "troll zone", and banish offending comments to that zone rather than delete them outright. A moderator can afford to enforce stricter policies when the punishment is relocation rather than deletion.
How do you think we should handle trolls on this forum? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ssava Creator of "The Dreamland Chronicles"

Joined: 12 Oct 2006 Posts: 1117 Location: Franklin, TN
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've found that when we had the Astonish Forum...there were so many NICE people...that to be honest...Trolls didn't really WANT to come by.
It was probably too BORING for them...ha ha.
So I say...keep the conversation NICE. Keep the threads CLEAN. And most likely Trolls won't really care. _________________ Scott Christian Sava
www.thedreamlandchronicles.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sphinx Minor Character

Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 55 Location: in a land of cute cuddly kittens
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Having come off a php board into an IPBoard, I have to say, it's seemed like the admins have more control over the board. There's also a nifty feature on the IPB called "warn" that would probably help.
That way, you're not doing nothing, and you're not just deleting. You're also setting them up to get banned by their own actions. Not that I want people to get banned, of course! Just mentioning this in passing is all _________________ Naji x Alex Shipper <3
Inverloch Forums. My second home
Mildly Evil  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TFBW Deus Ex Machina

Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1233 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've briefly evaluated a few forum software options, and none of them suited my needs particularly well. In the end, I went with the one that had a one-click install option from my hosting provider. I'm lazy, and I like the fact that it's easy to keep up with security updates this way, which is vitally important in the current Internet environment.
Back on the subject of trolls, I do believe that the best way to deal with them is to respond in the opposite spirit: refuse to be goaded; remain civil, or just don't reply. Of course, that usually fails for the same reason that trolls exist at all: human nature! Clearly ssava is upbeat and optimistic on this front, whereas I'm more cynical. I'd rather that folks were infected by ssava's attitude than my own, however, so I'll keep my hands off as much as posisble. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sphinx Minor Character

Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 55 Location: in a land of cute cuddly kittens
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Meep, I was just saying, was all! Sorry if I came off as pushy!
Let's all try to be all bubbly from now all like Scott, maybe we'll avoid further trolls  _________________ Naji x Alex Shipper <3
Inverloch Forums. My second home
Mildly Evil  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
antiphon Supporting Role

Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 250 Location: Dreamland...I wish. Sydney.
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
there ain't no place for cynics in Dreamland. jk...
if you've read LotR and The Hobbit, you should know. wait for daylight, and the trolls will turn to stone. as Gandalf the Dude knew.
seriously, though, I don't expect problems from Dreamland readers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_dave86 Supporting Role

Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 71 Location: Nashville, TN
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been to other boards where flamers are quite a problem, if they do it too much they get banned, if they flame admin or a mod they get banned the first time. this really does seem quite harsh to a lot of people and seems to make even more flamers. Best bet would be to ignore them.
I've not seen any flamers here, yet. Hopefully it will stay that way!  _________________ verily i say unto y'all |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nev Supporting Role
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 99 Location: Candanadia!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Y'know, I've never really understood that term, "flamers", I mean. What's the difference between flaming someone and being a troll? Alls I know is that I'm not so fond of either, given that they're both usually *words edited to keep commentary rated G* _________________ Not all who wander are lost. - Tolkien |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TFBW Deus Ex Machina

Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1233 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| A flamer is someone who sees a forum as an opportunity to practice public rudeness and lowbrow insults. Trolls, on the other hand, tend to be more subversive, provoking others to anger, or at least to waste their time with a response. Advanced trolls are characterised by insincerity and a desire to stir up a fuss: their words are calculated to generate a reaction. Base trolls are characterised by stupidity: they may actually believe what they say -- they just don't realise that they are exasperatingly stupid. A base troll may also be a flamer, whereas an advanced troll will aim to push your buttons without resort to insult. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nev Supporting Role
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 99 Location: Candanadia!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, gotcha. Gracias! _________________ Not all who wander are lost. - Tolkien |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gliphon Major Character

Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Posts: 313 Location: Land of ice and snow
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I of the opinion the anyone and everyone who partakes in trolling short get a quick bannation. Not that the issue really seems to be much of a problem here. _________________ I'm the 14th most important forumer.
Official nickname collector. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bezman Star of the Show

Joined: 08 Nov 2006 Posts: 1162 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gliphon wrote: | | I of the opinion the anyone and everyone who partakes in trolling short get a quick bannation. Not that the issue really seems to be much of a problem here. |
I take it that you mean "have", "that" and "should", you little trolling rascal, he he.
And I'll leave the rest of it be.  _________________ B cool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PsychotiChicken Undistinguished Extra
Joined: 29 Jun 2010 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nev wrote: | | Y'know, I've never really understood that term, "flamers", I mean. What's the difference between flaming someone and being a troll? Alls I know is that I'm not so fond of either, given that they're both usually *words edited to keep commentary rated G* |
| TFBW wrote: | | A flamer is someone who sees a forum as an opportunity to practice public rudeness and lowbrow insults. Trolls, on the other hand, tend to be more subversive, provoking others to anger, or at least to waste their time with a response. Advanced trolls are characterised by insincerity and a desire to stir up a fuss: their words are calculated to generate a reaction. Base trolls are characterised by stupidity: they may actually believe what they say -- they just don't realise that they are exasperatingly stupid. A base troll may also be a flamer, whereas an advanced troll will aim to push your buttons without resort to insult. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaming_(Internet)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)
In some contexts flaming may be appropriate. There is a "controversy corner" on this forum. I am not sure what would be wrong with flaming a topic in that thread. I have read the term "flaming" in reference to a logical attack at an idea that was posted. Frequently "flaming" is criticized because it is an ad hominym abusive. Banning people for making informal logical fallacies would be very harsh. Most people make informal fallacies frequently.
You can flame without being rude. I have posted the phrase "I do not have enough napalm for this thread >8( ". On some forum threads it got a vigorous positive response with posts like "tosses in canisters", "rolls in more drums", "turns on the blower fans", and "assembles spare torch".
The act of accusing someone of trolling is also flaming.
I thought the definition of "troll" was different from wikipedia's. They say a troll posts "extraneous or off topic material". I thought of "trolls" as users who try to persuade through volume of posts. In spoken conversation some people will raise his/her voice in order to talk over other people. On the internet you can not be louder but you can produce volumes of text.
Spamming involves copying the same message many times. In my thinking it is not spam if you type each character and thought about each sentence as you type. A very unimaginative troll could be accused of spamming. Copying large volumes of text is also spamming. If there was a discussion thread on abortion, copying the text of the book of genesis would be spam. Responding to dozens of pro-choice posts with "thou shalt not kill" would be trolling if fit the context each time, randomly posting the same message would be spam. On chat programs a spammer can block conversation by pasting text or images fast enough to move other comments off screen. My computer has locked up because of large volumes of smiley spam
There is a gray area with trolling. A web comic fan that reads each update and then posts an honest reaction is acting like a troll. That could be very helpful to the author and/or artist. Consider the case where someone comments on the shading and Scott listens and makes modifications. To us it would look like malicious trolling especially because the lighting, having been changed, looks great.
Is Scott Sava trolling his own comic by posting about his illnesses? What about the repeat questions about lighting? Personally I appreciate Scott's blogging. It adds something to a comic when it seams like the author is a real human. I can easily skip over the comments any day I do not want to read. Banning or threatening Scott Sava would be a mistake IMO. _________________ {8<>~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ssava Creator of "The Dreamland Chronicles"

Joined: 12 Oct 2006 Posts: 1117 Location: Franklin, TN
|
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll be good. I promise.
Please don't ban me. _________________ Scott Christian Sava
www.thedreamlandchronicles.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|