ADS Ads would appear here if your browser supported embedded HTML objects. ADS
Beyond the Fourth Wall Forum Index Beyond the Fourth Wall
Where webcomic readers conspire
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Oh noes! We're trapped in a webcomic!
What do you do with a troll?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beyond the Fourth Wall Forum Index -> Meta
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TFBW
Deus Ex Machina


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 1233
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:31 pm    Post subject: What do you do with a troll? Reply with quote

Every universe has its unpleasant characters: Douglas Adams had the delightfully dislikable Vogons; Tolkien had Orcs and Trolls, and so on. On a forum like this, you will get many different participants (or flame warriors), some of which are analogous to Adams' Vogons or Tolkien's Trolls. The appearance of conflicting or anti-social elements is inevitable: the question is how ought we deal with it when it happens?

Two obvious approaches are "delete offending posts" and "do nothing at all". I'm not particularly fond of either of these approaches. Doing nothing at all tends to lower the forum to a fairly predictable level, colloquially known as the lowest common demonimator. The Trolls drive out the Elves, so to speak.

Deleting offending posts is probably better, but not much. A determined Troll will take deletion as a challenge -- even a victory. A Troll might also play a game of brinkmanship; aiming for the borderline where some will complain if the post is not deleted, and others will cry "unfair censorship" if it is.

In a practical sense, we're constrained by the forum software: there's only so many actions a moderator can take. I'm somewhat inclined to set up a "troll zone", and banish offending comments to that zone rather than delete them outright. A moderator can afford to enforce stricter policies when the punishment is relocation rather than deletion.

How do you think we should handle trolls on this forum?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ssava
Creator of "The Dreamland Chronicles"


Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 1117
Location: Franklin, TN

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've found that when we had the Astonish Forum...there were so many NICE people...that to be honest...Trolls didn't really WANT to come by.

It was probably too BORING for them...ha ha.

So I say...keep the conversation NICE. Keep the threads CLEAN. And most likely Trolls won't really care.
_________________
Scott Christian Sava
www.thedreamlandchronicles.com


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sphinx
Minor Character


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 55
Location: in a land of cute cuddly kittens

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having come off a php board into an IPBoard, I have to say, it's seemed like the admins have more control over the board. There's also a nifty feature on the IPB called "warn" that would probably help.

That way, you're not doing nothing, and you're not just deleting. You're also setting them up to get banned by their own actions. Not that I want people to get banned, of course! Just mentioning this in passing is all
_________________
Naji x Alex Shipper <3
Inverloch Forums. My second home Smile

Mildly Evil Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TFBW
Deus Ex Machina


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 1233
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've briefly evaluated a few forum software options, and none of them suited my needs particularly well. In the end, I went with the one that had a one-click install option from my hosting provider. I'm lazy, and I like the fact that it's easy to keep up with security updates this way, which is vitally important in the current Internet environment.

Back on the subject of trolls, I do believe that the best way to deal with them is to respond in the opposite spirit: refuse to be goaded; remain civil, or just don't reply. Of course, that usually fails for the same reason that trolls exist at all: human nature! Clearly ssava is upbeat and optimistic on this front, whereas I'm more cynical. I'd rather that folks were infected by ssava's attitude than my own, however, so I'll keep my hands off as much as posisble.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sphinx
Minor Character


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 55
Location: in a land of cute cuddly kittens

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meep, I was just saying, was all! Sorry if I came off as pushy!
Let's all try to be all bubbly from now all like Scott, maybe we'll avoid further trolls Cool
_________________
Naji x Alex Shipper <3
Inverloch Forums. My second home Smile

Mildly Evil Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
antiphon
Supporting Role


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 250
Location: Dreamland...I wish. Sydney.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

there ain't no place for cynics in Dreamland. jk... Very Happy

if you've read LotR and The Hobbit, you should know. wait for daylight, and the trolls will turn to stone. as Gandalf the Dude knew.

seriously, though, I don't expect problems from Dreamland readers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the_dave86
Supporting Role


Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 71
Location: Nashville, TN

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been to other boards where flamers are quite a problem, if they do it too much they get banned, if they flame admin or a mod they get banned the first time. this really does seem quite harsh to a lot of people and seems to make even more flamers. Best bet would be to ignore them.

I've not seen any flamers here, yet. Hopefully it will stay that way! Cool
_________________
verily i say unto y'all
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Nev
Supporting Role


Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 99
Location: Candanadia!

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Y'know, I've never really understood that term, "flamers", I mean. What's the difference between flaming someone and being a troll? Alls I know is that I'm not so fond of either, given that they're both usually *words edited to keep commentary rated G*
_________________
Not all who wander are lost. - Tolkien
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TFBW
Deus Ex Machina


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 1233
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A flamer is someone who sees a forum as an opportunity to practice public rudeness and lowbrow insults. Trolls, on the other hand, tend to be more subversive, provoking others to anger, or at least to waste their time with a response. Advanced trolls are characterised by insincerity and a desire to stir up a fuss: their words are calculated to generate a reaction. Base trolls are characterised by stupidity: they may actually believe what they say -- they just don't realise that they are exasperatingly stupid. A base troll may also be a flamer, whereas an advanced troll will aim to push your buttons without resort to insult.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Nev
Supporting Role


Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 99
Location: Candanadia!

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, gotcha. Gracias!
_________________
Not all who wander are lost. - Tolkien
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gliphon
Major Character


Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 313
Location: Land of ice and snow

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I of the opinion the anyone and everyone who partakes in trolling short get a quick bannation. Not that the issue really seems to be much of a problem here.
_________________
I'm the 14th most important forumer.

Official nickname collector.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bezman
Star of the Show


Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1162
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gliphon wrote:
I of the opinion the anyone and everyone who partakes in trolling short get a quick bannation. Not that the issue really seems to be much of a problem here.

I take it that you mean "have", "that" and "should", you little trolling rascal, he he. Wink
And I'll leave the rest of it be. Smile
_________________
B cool.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PsychotiChicken
Undistinguished Extra


Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nev wrote:
Y'know, I've never really understood that term, "flamers", I mean. What's the difference between flaming someone and being a troll? Alls I know is that I'm not so fond of either, given that they're both usually *words edited to keep commentary rated G*


TFBW wrote:
A flamer is someone who sees a forum as an opportunity to practice public rudeness and lowbrow insults. Trolls, on the other hand, tend to be more subversive, provoking others to anger, or at least to waste their time with a response. Advanced trolls are characterised by insincerity and a desire to stir up a fuss: their words are calculated to generate a reaction. Base trolls are characterised by stupidity: they may actually believe what they say -- they just don't realise that they are exasperatingly stupid. A base troll may also be a flamer, whereas an advanced troll will aim to push your buttons without resort to insult.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaming_(Internet)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)

In some contexts flaming may be appropriate. There is a "controversy corner" on this forum. I am not sure what would be wrong with flaming a topic in that thread. I have read the term "flaming" in reference to a logical attack at an idea that was posted. Frequently "flaming" is criticized because it is an ad hominym abusive. Banning people for making informal logical fallacies would be very harsh. Most people make informal fallacies frequently.

You can flame without being rude. I have posted the phrase "I do not have enough napalm for this thread >8( ". On some forum threads it got a vigorous positive response with posts like "tosses in canisters", "rolls in more drums", "turns on the blower fans", and "assembles spare torch".

The act of accusing someone of trolling is also flaming.

I thought the definition of "troll" was different from wikipedia's. They say a troll posts "extraneous or off topic material". I thought of "trolls" as users who try to persuade through volume of posts. In spoken conversation some people will raise his/her voice in order to talk over other people. On the internet you can not be louder but you can produce volumes of text.

Spamming involves copying the same message many times. In my thinking it is not spam if you type each character and thought about each sentence as you type. A very unimaginative troll could be accused of spamming. Copying large volumes of text is also spamming. If there was a discussion thread on abortion, copying the text of the book of genesis would be spam. Responding to dozens of pro-choice posts with "thou shalt not kill" would be trolling if fit the context each time, randomly posting the same message would be spam. On chat programs a spammer can block conversation by pasting text or images fast enough to move other comments off screen. My computer has locked up because of large volumes of smiley spam
Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad

There is a gray area with trolling. A web comic fan that reads each update and then posts an honest reaction is acting like a troll. That could be very helpful to the author and/or artist. Consider the case where someone comments on the shading and Scott listens and makes modifications. To us it would look like malicious trolling especially because the lighting, having been changed, looks great.

Is Scott Sava trolling his own comic by posting about his illnesses? What about the repeat questions about lighting? Personally I appreciate Scott's blogging. It adds something to a comic when it seams like the author is a real human. I can easily skip over the comments any day I do not want to read. Banning or threatening Scott Sava would be a mistake IMO.
_________________
{8<>~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ssava
Creator of "The Dreamland Chronicles"


Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 1117
Location: Franklin, TN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll be good. I promise.
Please don't ban me.
_________________
Scott Christian Sava
www.thedreamlandchronicles.com


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beyond the Fourth Wall Forum Index -> Meta All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
ADS ADS